Please log in

Paper / Information search system

日本語

ENGLISH

Help

Please log in

  • Summary & Details

Validating an Approach to Assess Sensor Perception Reliabilities Without Ground Truth

Detailed Information

Author(E)1) Marco Kryda, 2) Mario Berk, 3) Boris Buschardt, 4) Daniel Straub
Affiliation(E)1) Technical University of Munich, 2) AUDI AG, 3) AUDI AG, 4) Technical University of Munich
Abstract(E)A reliable environment perception is a requirement for safe automated driving. For evaluating and demonstrating the reliability of the vehicle’s environment perception, field tests offer testing conditions that come closest to the vehicle’s driving environment. However, establishing a reference ground truth in field tests is time-consuming. This motivates the development of a procedure for learning the vehicle’s perception reliability from fleet data without the need for a ground truth, which would allow learning the perception reliability from fleet data.
In Berk et al. (2019), a method based on Bayesian inference to determine the perception reliability of individual sensors without the need for a ground truth was proposed. The model utilizes the redundancy of sensors to learn the sensor’s perception reliability. The method was tested with simulated data. In this contribution, we further explore and validate the method by utilizing real data, including ground truth data based on high-resolution LIDAR and human labeling. An area with overlapping field of view from five sensors is selected for the analysis. A basic association method is used to compare the object data obtained from the different sensors. Finally, we compare the sensor perception reliabilities learned from the Bayesian inference model with the sensor perception reliabilities determined from the labeled ground truth.
In this paper, it is shown that the model introduced in Berk et al. (2019) can approximate the reference data based on the provided ground truth. The estimated parameters of the model do not perfectly correspond to the sensor reliabilities but are of the same order of magnitude as when derived from the ground truth.

About search

close

How to use the search box

You can enter up to 5 search conditions. The number of search boxes can be increased or decreased with the "+" and "-" buttons on the right.
If you enter multiple words separated by spaces in one search box, the data that "contains all" of the entered words will be searched (AND search).
Example) X (space) Y → "X and Y (including)"

How to use "AND" and "OR" pull-down

If "AND" is specified, the "contains both" data of the phrase entered in the previous and next search boxes will be searched. If you specify "OR", the data that "contains" any of the words entered in the search boxes before and after is searched.
Example) X AND Y → "X and Y (including)"  X OR Z → "X or Z (including)"
If AND and OR searches are mixed, OR search has priority.
Example) X AND Y OR Z → X AND (Y OR Z)
If AND search and multiple OR search are mixed, OR search has priority.
Example) W AND X OR Y OR Z → W AND (X OR Y OR Z)

How to use the search filters

Use the "search filters" when you want to narrow down the search results, such as when there are too many search results. If you check each item, the search results will be narrowed down to only the data that includes that item.
The number in "()" after each item is the number of data that includes that item.

Search tips

When searching by author name, enter the first and last name separated by a space, such as "Taro Jidosha".