An Investigation of Aerodynamic Characteristics of Three Bluff Bodies in Close Longitudinal Proximity - Part 2
- Delivery
- Provide download link
- Format
- Price
- Non-members (tax incl.)：￥6,600 Members (tax incl.)：￥5,280
- Paper/Info type
- SAE Paper
No.2021-01-0952
- Pages
- 1-29(Total 29 p)
- Date of publication
- Apr 2021
- Publisher
- SAE International
- Language
- English
- Event
- SAE WCX Digital Summit 2021
Detailed Information
| Author(E) | 1) Geoffrey Le Good, 2) Matthew Self, 3) Peter Boardman, 4) Max Resnick |
|---|---|
| Affiliation(E) | 1) Coventry University, 2) Coventry University, 3) Coventry University, 4) Coventry University |
| Abstract(E) | The work described in this paper is a continuation of an investigation into the effects of systematic changes in upper-body geometry on the aerodynamic drag of passenger-car-like bluff-body models in close longitudinal proximity and operating in platoon formations. The original work, presented in SAE paper 2019-01-0659, showed measurements of the aerodynamic drag of individual models within three-model platoons and for which each model was tested in three different upper-body configurations This provided a data-set of 27 platoon configurations to compare with the three baseline conditions of the isolated models. The work contrasted with other published platooning research in which the spacing, between homogeneous models in the platoons, was the only variable to be considered. In this publication the results of further wind tunnel tests, using the same models as before but in two-model platoons, providing a further 9 test configurations are compared with the original data. In addition, the results of CFD analyses for both the two and three-model platoon configurations are reported to help provide a more detailed and illustrated explanation of the modification of flow regimes and subsequent forces due to close-proximity. The most significant influence on drag of the proximity tests was shown to be the interference on upstream wakes due to the presence of a following model. The shielding effect provided to trailing models also resulted in a drag reduction by reducing pressure drag on upright nose surfaces. But shielding also resulted in a drag penalty by reducing flow velocity over the radiused leading edges, particularly of the A-pillars thereby reducing a low pressure zone which, in unobstructed flow, yields a drag reduction for the Windsor model. |
